From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 08:31:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D4E1065674 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CEC8FC17 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2B8Rt1x073711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:27:55 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.2/8.12.11) id n2B8V6WD056612; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:31:06 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:31:06 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200903110831.n2B8V6WD056612@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: odhiambo@gmail.com In-reply-to: <991123400903032304p7409c4ecvb76a6c6946b82920@mail.gmail.com> (odhiambo@gmail.com) References: <200903040326.n243QHY1041181@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <991123400903032304p7409c4ecvb76a6c6946b82920@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAE kernel problem on Dell PowerEdge 2950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:31:47 -0000 Hi, > However, I am going to use 7.1-STABLE on them. > > I see no reason why you should run 6.4 at all though. What's your > motivation towards thaat angle? > > I suggest you install the 7.1 and update it to -STABLE then see if > anything changes as regards the CPU (est message), while we wait for > the magic word from the dedicated developers. With some delay in the reply: for a production server I try to keep with the legacy version of FreeBSD. And I stick to RELENG, not STABLE, because I want to patch security bugs, but I most probably does not need all the new bells and whistles of STABLE: this is a production server, I prefer to modify the machine as least as possible, unless it is expressely needed by a secuity issue (I won't apply security patches if they are not pertinent to a specific server and the services running on that machine). Bests, Olivier