From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 22 03:56:45 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B76B106564A;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:56:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.216.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67898FC0C;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2406675qwj.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:56:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=V0ikIir6/RV5TZNc7EiwfQKI5OkTkhYQXxTWLUwUk/A=;
	b=Jd2nImfMN8U3o5I6uc6HpBx7Z97Pmd/cGG3qhPpQQQ8INfUn3Cru7Z4YUiM23Y8U6I
	V3ROHd7kNleeBiAGj94kT4iP9oqVT1n2r42k6drCIwjaYSRsbYdeg0c+Q9IGK2Mfb9QZ
	/WuAGZh4X3vxdjoffhUGyNQkgtl7Z4OTZ/ilQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=T1ZjXi+Eu3gNcThWQ0z969gwEwzEiRobIfRlBtM2/HOvtlBB0EI606ZXGC7sUd7QLx
	xUWxrZHvLxOadhw9kYvkMpfoAGO7CYnJE4PhofvPgg8I1nwrr24CtQGQvYIT3uJtvp7J
	/04U9piMBBQd82fDp4BxOksSyU2bMIZhdGYf4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.2.69 with SMTP id 5mr1391652qai.120.1295668603766; Fri, 21
	Jan 2011 19:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.198.203 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:56:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan+Q172QT@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan+Q172QT@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:56:43 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:56:45 -0000

On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
> if_ath code into -HEAD.

Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
all the code was just shuffled around a bit.

Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
would test this out and get back to me.

I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing
over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic
802.11n support for testing.



Adrian