From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 18 21:51:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mharnois.mdharnois.net (customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com [209.240.253.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEE137B404 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:51:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mharnois.mdharnois.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA593C9F; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:51:28 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.2.0 going to come into the tree again? From: "Michael D. Harnois" To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: John Reynolds~ , ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <15466.41061.322518.417088@chlx169.ch.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 18 Feb 2002 23:51:27 -0600 Message-Id: <1014097888.2604.51.camel@mharnois.mdharnois.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 12:15, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > I believe people generally do want to get 4.2.0 back into the ports > collection, but that XFree86 port needed some reorganization work. It also broke drm-kmod. -- Michael D. Harnois bilocational bivocational Pastor, Redeemer Lutheran Church Washburn, Iowa 1L, UST School of Law Minneapolis, Minnesota A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular. -- Adlai Stevenson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message