From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 20:20:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BF816A41F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 20:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik.winge@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A0043D49 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 20:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik.winge@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1266981wra for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qxr9Q8lQgXuC8tu6s8WlHQG3kRvAyiRfvDYerPIuW/V4M1y6ik32cVf6jJ99rEIhuVQnVaGetNgmc6Ot4m3Y7cM4xVNLyT+iiromHo3R/Cc+qpqHPw9o9zkt3o4Ecw3h525TEj/icdd1dnON5gv0RZOodQfr0E/ffA7x8vERdiY= Received: by 10.54.34.20 with SMTP id h20mr2169306wrh; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.80.20 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4cf221cc05090613208a72a08@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:20:01 +0200 From: Erik Winge To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4cf221cc050718035328cfb071@mail.gmail.com> <05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu> Subject: Re: if_ural in 6.0-BETA1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 20:20:04 -0000 Hi, On 7/18/05, =C1d=E1m Szilveszter dr. wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Unfortunately, I see similar symptoms with two ral(4) based cards ( > Conceptronic C54RC) in two laptops, one running 6.0-BETA, the other > 7.0-CURRENT, both from 16th July. I have not yet been able to determine > under what conditions the random dissassociations occur, but no network > traffic is one way to more reliably trigger it. After the disassociation > occurs, wpa_supplicant starts scanning, even finds the AP a couple of > times, but fails to reassociate until killed and restarted. The AP is a > Linksys WRT54G with original Linksys firmware, and I am using a > WPA-PSK-based setup. I still have the same problem in 6.0-BETA4. if_ural will disassociate if the network connection is idle for more than a couple of minutes. This happens every time I leave my computer running without any network traffic. I also use WPA-PSK. Regards, Erik Winge