Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:40:36 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Message-ID: <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jGeMMIxMtEKVUxQ4XWGwg7J9CUGnIL0Ng Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="RN3QAEicpgqWxSDtB05fsxtJJ5qpfFloj"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> --RN3QAEicpgqWxSDtB05fsxtJJ5qpfFloj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> writes: >> >>> On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: >>>> I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can >>>> help me to make portmaster an actively maintained and used tool. >>> >>> If you can have it build in a clean chroot or jail then you'll get my= >>> attention >> >> What kind of special support? >> >> I use it with a chroot that mounts /usr/ports (and src) read-only, and= >> aside from the initial base system install, it took about fifteen >> minutes to set up. >> >=20 > Using chroot or jails to build each individual package > [...] While I understand the interest in chroot/jails as an optional feature, I hope it doesn't become required. The current non-use of chroot/jails is, for me, a feature -- not a bug. -- George --RN3QAEicpgqWxSDtB05fsxtJJ5qpfFloj-- --jGeMMIxMtEKVUxQ4XWGwg7J9CUGnIL0Ng Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAlimDksACgkQwRES3m+p 4fkmLxAAi6xEjMqAXDArLyYIVoFVGdGZU5cCfsWqr5Hy+WNCItKPCjtttihQSziO M71YVxmnFo8KomXWbkWH7S40/a8bBppLwSPsbBgD5K4IGGK77z/4VgjMwt9BpxiR VdeZiShC/jVABENHqAiaaI380jMWCcRwFpU9qNFZdRVzYkQ4WI3+wU78XmMK5JYf 6HOWFsbrWVtrCwzH2tCuDrMBYwo4jyMH3SX5e4CCVPWq8aYUqGX2k44ALN2mUwcA ev2dhfdUb78w0uGuOTTmrOYyCY6s+Z2qFk6OqVWrftryJk4r7SA1XJYn1PHX/+vw wwZlhcfOW19KTqpCJrGd8CwTh1XYOKV9opDvlFwJGVIQKJSWrNAfh1lcanEvnCDf mNdLjmc8vnfghsO21IIuviB+O6FNtzdTS1f6r5rY05ch+9BjktefjAfCO0p2fQSX vmlXCUs20vxrRBWKE51REzvjWydDMizTA1V+ENecaw8f5yssTiy1+VgwLLBb4Sa/ X2/RGCLbGC8z1Iw5MrI2Wuk71s4gJczxTmtUZsPaYVEunPYES3NjlRsCKTdKgHiz mOr0Kvrr9K5tm5V/5G7JhFlmraoDXP/LQ0V0HVi0P4CSTVc2izZcYqELICYvoZWN FJYVn8nEzHrgvGK/lQ/pcTw604CSHOMADoPkD/fX0YZ9vATjF6U= =m+aw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jGeMMIxMtEKVUxQ4XWGwg7J9CUGnIL0Ng--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e>