Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:52:01 +0200
From:      Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: amd64 as nfs-server
Message-ID:  <B589A45197D86CC1756A095D@rambutan.pingpong.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


--On fredag, april 29, 2005 17.24.03 -0400 Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> 
wrote:

> On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:00 pm, Palle Girgensohn said:
>
>>> I'm getting a couple of Dell 2850's with dual EMT64 cpu's @ 2.8 GHz to
>>> replace our very trusty PIII-nfs-servers. I am accustomed to the
>>> rock-solid stability of the i386-port of the 5.x-branch and will
>>> probably put i386 on them. But has anyone used the amd64 coupled with PE
>>> 2850's as nfs-servers? They have onboard em-interfaces.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I do use 2850 w/ amd64, and with dual CPU and hyper threading, it is not
>> stable, it crashes a lot. I'm debugging it, we'll see what turns up.
>
> 5.x is known to be unstable with 4 CPUs.
> I bet you would be ok if you
> disabled hyper threading.

It actually says "more than four real CPUs" 
<http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html>,  so I thought I'd be 
safe. True, though, disabling hyperthreading seems to fix the problem...

/Palle



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B589A45197D86CC1756A095D>