From owner-freebsd-doc Sat May 18 6:30:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E737B40C for ; Sat, 18 May 2002 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4IDU2274642; Sat, 18 May 2002 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205181330.g4IDU2274642@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Marc Fonvieille Subject: Re: docs/38240: In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook "X-server" should be "X server" Reply-To: Marc Fonvieille Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/38240; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marc Fonvieille To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/38240: In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook "X-server" should be "X server" Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 15:17:07 +0200 On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 04:01:39PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hello Marc, Hi Giorgos ;) > > Well spotted. You are right that one of the two (and not both) should > be used. I'm more in favor of X server or X-server, since "X > server" can be wrapper in many funny ways as shown below: > > After you install the X > server, ... > > What do you think? On www.xfree86.org, they use XFree86 X server (http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/DESIGN.html for example). So X server seems to be the best solution. And maybe Configure X-Server should be Configure XFree86 X Server; and in the text X server should be used. cheers, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message