From owner-cvs-all  Wed May  5 14:28:49 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C5EDC15D83; Wed,  5 May 1999 14:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br)
Received: (from jonny@localhost)
	by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA02350;
	Wed, 5 May 1999 18:27:56 -0300 (EST)
	(envelope-from jonny)
From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Message-Id: <199905052127.SAA02350@roma.coe.ufrj.br>
Subject: tcp_wrappers support
In-Reply-To: <199905052056.WAA14595@greenpeace.grondar.za> from Mark Murray at "May 5, 1999 10:56: 7 pm"
To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray)
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 18:27:56 -0300 (EST)
Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, anders@sanyusan.se,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, torsten@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

#define quoting(Mark Murray)
// "David O'Brien" wrote:
// > > Shouldn't -STABLE also have the /etc/hosts.allow just as -CURRENT got?
// > > 
// > > To make the tcp_wrappers support complete before 3.2-RELEASE?
// > 
// > Yes, I didn't keep the original commit message, so I'm picking the
// > things to MFC from memory.  If there is anything else I've forgotten,
// > please let me know.
// 
// I'm being a bit slack supporting you here, I know! 
// 
// After hosts.allow, you are 100% done.

  Humm...

  What about ports which depend on tcp_wrappers ?   Is it time to move
them in this direction ?  Remove tcp_wrappers from ports, and
rearrange every port which depend on it.  I'm particularly interested
in ssh, and could create some patches if nobody else has time.

					Jonny

--
João Carlos Mendes Luís			jonny@jonny.eng.br


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message