From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 03:48:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 674) id F01A716A4CF; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: mlaier@vampire.homelinux.org Received: (qmail 23372 invoked by uid 1005); 29 Aug 2003 07:09:19 -0000 Delivered-To: max@vampire.homelinux.org Received: (qmail 23369 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 07:09:19 -0000 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (212.227.126.184) by pd9e39106.dip.t-dialin.net with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 07:09:19 -0000 Received: from [212.227.126.211] (helo=mxng15.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19seGs-00076Q-00 for max@vampire.homelinux.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:06:14 +0200 Received: from [206.53.239.180] (helo=turing.freelists.org) by mxng15.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19seGl-0005U6-00 for max@love2party.net; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:06:07 +0200 Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id DA699390689; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:06:32 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pf4freebsd); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:05:50 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org Received: from ns.kt-is.co.kr (unknown [211.218.149.125]) ESMTP id 0F9DD390815 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:05:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from michelle.kt-is.co.kr (ns2.kt-is.co.kr [220.76.118.193]) (authenticated bits=128) by ns.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h7T84jqb008034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:04:45 +0900 (KST) Received: from michelle.kt-is.co.kr (localhost.kt-is.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7T84fM3013442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:04:41 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7T84euZ013441 for pf4freebsd@freelists.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:04:40 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) From: Pyun YongHyeon To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org Message-ID: <20030829080440.GB12809@kt-is.co.kr> References: <200308262103.12394.alan@precisionautobody.com> <200308262247.46254.alan@precisionautobody.com> <01a901c36cee$09bd6810$01000001@max900> <200308271625.05235.alan@precisionautobody.com> <025801c36cfa$3e756290$01000001@max900> <1062074062.31217.14.camel@quark.avioc.org> <20030829032218.GB11397@kt-is.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030829032218.GB11397@kt-is.co.kr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (ns.kt-is.co.kr) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 120 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pf4freebsd-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: pf4freebsd-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: yongari@kt-is.co.kr Precedence: normal X-list: pf4freebsd X-UID: 233 X-Length: 4549 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:55:51 +0000 Subject: [pf4freebsd] Re: Bridging? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Reply-To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:48:11 -0000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:04:40 +0900 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:48:11 -0000 On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:22:18PM +0900, To pf4freebsd@freelists.org wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:15:45AM -0500, Brandon Weisz wrote: > > Max, > > I tested your patch with basically the same setup as Alan. I'm using > > the pf port, not sure if I should be testing with 1.62. > > > If your system is -current you should use latest version > (not in ports tree). > > > The quick and dirty is I didn't see any of the debug messages from > > bridge.c.diff in the dmesg. > > > The debugging message may show up on your CONSOLE. If you do not > see any messages such as 'START, TRUE, calling' on your console, > it means pf does not work on bridge setup. However I don't think > so because bridge code supports PFIL_HOOKS and ipfilter also > relys on this feature.(But I can't sure 'cause I don't even use > bridge at all.) > I have tried bridge(4) with kernel module on -current. No luck. I can't believe this so I have tried ipf. It did not work too. There must be a bug in bridge(4) code itself. At present it seems that there is no way to use pf or ipf (which uses PFIL_HOOK) on bridge setup with/without assigning a IP address. Is there anyone using ipf on bridge setup? Regards, Pyun YongHyeon -- Pyun YongHyeon KTIS, Inc. +82-2-597-0600