Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:35:22 +0000 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Moore <kris@ixsystems.com>, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Base Package Origins Message-ID: <20160426203522.GA1804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2F3CAD0D-C439-48BE-B4CC-6F8E43635F77@FreeBSD.org> References: <571FAB49.3010706@ixsystems.com> <30D7273F-2A21-4D7D-9997-26BDC61EB2AD@FreeBSD.org> <571FC5C2.9080002@ixsystems.com> <20160426195338.GX1804@FreeBSD.org> <2F3CAD0D-C439-48BE-B4CC-6F8E43635F77@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SHFFXbs3XlGSDX14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:08:39PM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2016, at 16:53, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >=20 > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:47:14PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote: > >> On 04/26/16 03:40 PM, Renato Botelho wrote: > >>>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 14:54, Kris Moore <kris@ixsystems.com> wrote: > >>>>=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> So, we're in the process of moving to package base for PC-BSD -CURRE= NT > >>>> images next month. The only real nit I'm seeing so far is that each > >>>> package has a origin of 'base'. Shouldn't that be unique for each > >>>> package? I.E. base/FreeBSD-<foo> > >>> Hi Kris, > >>>=20 > >>> We are working to move pfSense 2.4 development snapshots to 11 with b= ase package as well > >>>=20 > >>> How are you dealing with files installed by distrib* targets? (/etc/r= c, /etc/master.passwd, =E2=80=A6) > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >> I've looked at a kludge to ship those bits as another .txz. Did you ha= ve > >> another method, or is this something we can expect fixed properly as a > >> package, I.E. FreeBSD-distrib-FOO.txz > >>=20 > >=20 > > One (other kludge) I was considering was automatically invoking > > etcupdate(8) on 'FreeBSD-runtime' installation, which should > > automatically populate /etc on a clean install, as well as keeping /etc > > updated as part of upgrades. > >=20 > > But, I *really* do not like that idea... >=20 > That was the only idea I had too. Why don=E2=80=99t you like it? >=20 If there is a merge conflict, it enforces interactive resolution. Glen --SHFFXbs3XlGSDX14 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXH9EKAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTIiQP/1A7Aqtd1Wo0IC4nk2GhBHop iA4IG6rriQLW+YNDuh1lxkyrDjBS652uzWMNAF7wM2OpLJaQ9CUDQNaVMUPWVt7y K7+t9ox+5AZjpIzmHq2IxN5cfWRsovete9VCzVS27h3sSkfL77hRndyg2ZpXkEEs eKMo2TnwgmuXxu4qhliw2IU7Zaf3VV9ABe7QkuoUsJn2TaGIcRUiEp/406QPkr8+ AHPs6xO1SVggVAVa1mZdImTbxktIByv7XzzorzaM3BV2Hxh39MLdyl7+OhhnnTfB 7iGqdIGlgUAMyvVWuXHJKeUirwuLlox33BqJ+a9ff/lHDeCN2/h7aMjS589hceNm IVnHbKhzMEODXzbK7VMuhs9o7Khb7mDYxFpSxbVJNuW1nSyXokP+MjSxiDkwrpFz duTn55LGiVF480lZNUHmR4BUbrs2GjHbmJaOnKG/B+Q8e58eCAV/twwY9/yrcXz1 LAOuHR6/bMnE9i5FQNb858t0r+l32qy1e2I7+F1Yzz/wr7+3lRDzGAD/7BnW/jVo 0nJEWbIXNfgwPRkbj/Mm2+72/Cve5dkATGT7vQUoq41BbaZqHn29lnIdEzlWoy1B U5Eb5PJwvZ82UbFJYN3VWiwltdNGDNwrCQX3qW5Xua3MCtfaHjUHH5uqH+kjAgAh 5pVap8xq4YZbesAXTd4/ =p4xR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SHFFXbs3XlGSDX14--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160426203522.GA1804>