Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:30:32 +0100 (MEZ)
From:      "Hr.Ladavac" <lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
To:        lada@ws2313.gud.siemens.co.at (Hr.Ladavac)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at, vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM, michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, tom@sdf.com, sergey@extech.msk.su, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <199702261730.AA177658232@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
In-Reply-To: <199702261726.AA177037988@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> from "Hr.Ladavac" at Feb 26, 97 06:26:28 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
E-mail message from Hr.Ladavac contained:
> E-mail message from Terry Lambert contained:
> > > With the slight exception of PPro processors where both L1 and L2 caches
> > > reside in the same package, albeit on two separate pieces of sillicon...
> > 
> > What a neat idea.  Then if you want a larger L2, I can make you
> > buy a whole new processor.
> 
> And charge you double: after all, you're getting twice as many
> transistors in the cache...

My brain fart: you should consider it a bargain, since you're getting
at least *four* time as many transistors (the cache is static, idiot :)

/Marino
> 
> /Marino
> > 
> > 8-|
> > 
> > 
> > 					Terry Lambert
> > 					terry@lambert.org
> > ---
> > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
> > or previous employers.
> > 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702261730.AA177658232>