Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 18:30:32 +0100 (MEZ) From: "Hr.Ladavac" <lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> To: lada@ws2313.gud.siemens.co.at (Hr.Ladavac) Cc: terry@lambert.org, lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at, vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM, michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, tom@sdf.com, sergey@extech.msk.su, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD Message-ID: <199702261730.AA177658232@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> In-Reply-To: <199702261726.AA177037988@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> from "Hr.Ladavac" at Feb 26, 97 06:26:28 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
E-mail message from Hr.Ladavac contained: > E-mail message from Terry Lambert contained: > > > With the slight exception of PPro processors where both L1 and L2 caches > > > reside in the same package, albeit on two separate pieces of sillicon... > > > > What a neat idea. Then if you want a larger L2, I can make you > > buy a whole new processor. > > And charge you double: after all, you're getting twice as many > transistors in the cache... My brain fart: you should consider it a bargain, since you're getting at least *four* time as many transistors (the cache is static, idiot :) /Marino > > /Marino > > > > 8-| > > > > > > Terry Lambert > > terry@lambert.org > > --- > > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > > or previous employers. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702261730.AA177658232>