From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 15 16: 8:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wolf.istc.kiev.ua (wolf.istc.kiev.ua [193.193.221.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7CA37B403; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:08:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kunia@istc.kiev.ua) Received: from localhost (kunia@localhost) by wolf.istc.kiev.ua ( . . / . . ) with ESMTP id BAA26767; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 01:57:40 +0300 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 01:57:40 +0300 (EEST) From: Olexander Kunytsa To: Ben Smithurst Cc: , Subject: Re: standard-supfile and stable-supfile have no difference? In-Reply-To: <20010815235045.A40908@strontium.shef.vinosystems.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Olexander Kunytsa wrote: > > > It is pointed that 'standard-supfile' contains CVSup collections > > for FreeBSD-current source tree, but how does it differ from > > 'stable-supfile'? > > standard-supfile in -stable now gets you the -stable sources, which > kinda makes sense really. Where does it say that it gets you the > -current sources? If it's somewhere in our documentation, please send > in a PR and someone will fix it. > Enigma# head standard-supfile # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile,v 1.17.2.2 2001/04/11 21:5 0:13 nik Exp $ # # This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the # FreeBSD-current source tree. # Enigma# uname -a FreeBSD Enigma.unix.land 4.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Aug 15 22:43:04 EEST 2001 root@Enigma.unix.land:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DURON i386 today's cvsup and world To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message