From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 29 22:38:01 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D602B4F9
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:38:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wbe@psr.com)
Received: from psr.com (mail.psr.com [67.212.42.216])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804351BDB
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:38:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from psr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by psr.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3TMQOPT056591
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:26:24 -0400 (EDT)
 (envelope-from wbe@psr.com)
Received: (from wbe@localhost)
 by psr.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r3TMQOnI056590;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:26:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe)
Message-Id: <201304292226.r3TMQOnI056590@psr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:26 EDT
From: Winston <wbe@psr.com>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory
 FreeBSD-SA-13:05.nfsserver
References: <20130429205552$12b7@rincewind.paeps.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20130429205552$12b7@rincewind.paeps.cx> (FreeBSD Security
 Advisories's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:55:52 +0200")
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 03:41:15 +0000
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:38:01 -0000

For the purpose of the NFS vulnerability in 9.0-RELEASE, does it make
any difference whether one has used /etc/exports and an explicitly
started nfsd, or exported the files using "zfs set sharenfs={options}"
if the exported file system in both cases is ZFS?  (That's probably
similar to asking whether ZFS has its own NFSd code or uses
/usr/sbin/nfsd.)

Thanks in advance,
 -WBE