From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 29 5:31:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81DF837B443 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:31:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 46346 invoked by uid 1000); 29 May 2001 12:30:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:30:45 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, demon@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin.Chuguev@dante.org.uk Subject: Re: devel/gettext upgrade [patch] Message-ID: <20010529153045.B44050@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.org, demon@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin.Chuguev@dante.org.uk References: <200105291031.f4TAVLt05758@vega.vega.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200105291031.f4TAVLt05758@vega.vega.com>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 01:30:51PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 01:30:51PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi folks, > > Since I did not receive any response from demon regarding my > comments on his patch I've picked up the ball and did the work > by myself. Attached please find resulting patch, please review > it and let me know what do you think. Following are major changes > compared to demon's version: Just a random thought: won't this affect just as many ports in the tree as the devel/libtool update to 1.4 that reg is holding up until proven absolutely necessary? See the devel/libtool/Makefile for more info.. G'luck, Peter -- Hey, out there - is it *you* reading me, or is it someone else? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message