From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 17:12:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4E7912 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B04EB6 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34CE33C1D; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:12:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B15FE39814; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:12:02 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Chris Stankevitz Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing References: Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:12:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Stankevitz's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:41:22 -0800") Message-ID: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:12:16 -0000 Chris Stankevitz writes: > Q: Should I be alarmed? > > Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created > and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard > drive. The Handbook (or at least the obvious interpretation of what it says; the awkward phrasing may mean that it was mis-edited at some point) is incorrect. I'm not sure that a one-size-fits-all default ruleset (of the sort that exists for ipfw) is practical for pf.