From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Jan 17 21:51:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658EB15093 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:51:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12ARXv-000OC3-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:51:15 -0800 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 Code freeze? References: <20000117084445.A11343@student.rug.ac.be> <200001180539.WAA14475@harmony.village.org> Message-Id: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:51:15 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org normally i stay out of these 'discussions'. everyone's efforts are much appreciated. and we know that the rate of pay sucks caterpillar snot. but, in this case, you seem to be saying "no one asked," and there is no sense to be silent so we hit this next time. this is not a flame. and i can easily be misunderstanding the implications of what you're saying. but ... a lot of folk stayed at 2.2.x-PAO until 3.x+PAO supported our hardware. some of us had to wait a long time because we have minority cards such as old-style wavelans. we deeply appreciate the PAO folk's efforts in supporting us fossils, and we all pretty much now run 3.3+PAO. and now it sounds as if we may not be running 4.0 until the PAO folk patch over the cracks in 4.x. or, if 4.x-PAO support will not be there, we just stay at 3.3+PAO. or am i misunderstanding you? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message