From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 5 14:58:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17781 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 14:58:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sodium.network-alchemy.com (Sodium.Network-Alchemy.COM [199.46.17.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA17692 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 14:57:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from key@network-alchemy.com) Received: from sodium.network-alchemy.com (localhost.Network-Alchemy.COM [127.0.0.1]) by sodium.network-alchemy.com (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA09621; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 14:57:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from key@network-alchemy.com) Message-Id: <199802052257.OAA09621@sodium.network-alchemy.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: key@network-alchemy.com Subject: Anyone familiar with the Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+? Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 14:57:08 -0800 From: Ken Key Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers" Hi Folks, it's getting rather difficult to find Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B's - they are being replaced by the PRO/100+. It appears that the PRO/100+ uses a new Intel Ether chip - the 82558. Has anyone investigated using the fxp driver with the PRO/100+ or what it would take to integrate support for the PRO/100+ Thanks for any info, Ken Key -- Ken Key (key@network-alchemy.com)