From owner-cvs-all  Tue Aug  1 23:54:26 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0ACA737B705; Tue,  1 Aug 2000 23:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kbyanc@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from kbyanc@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id XAA40228;
	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kbyanc@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200008020654.XAA40228@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/patch patch.c pch.c
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

kbyanc      2000/08/01 23:54:22 PDT

  Modified files:
    gnu/usr.bin/patch    patch.c pch.c 
  Log:
  Fix patch such that skipping files does not count as a failure.
  Previously, using -S/--skip, -f/--force, or -t/--batch to skip a patch in
  a patchset still registers a failure which causes patch to return a
  non-zero exit code. This is particularly undesirable with regards to
  ports as there is no way to ignore the non-zero code. (Luckily, we don't
  currently have any ports that make use of any of these options.)
  
  The PR (yes, my own) is slightly incorrect: It states that -f does indeed
  properly skip patches. It does, but it still sets the failure flag causing
  patch to return non-zero.
  
  PR:		19638
  Submitted by:	kbyanc@posi.net
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.17      +1 -2      src/gnu/usr.bin/patch/patch.c
  1.17      +2 -2      src/gnu/usr.bin/patch/pch.c



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message