Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:57:26 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <200010041357.e94DvQc92408@pau-amma.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <200010031722.NAA41823@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:22:27 -0400 (EDT) >From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> ><<On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:16:12 +0100, David Pick <D.M.Pick@qmw.ac.uk> said: >> gets no response (after a time-out) it would be entitled to retry a >> few times in case of packet loss. *But* if it gets a RST, which is a >If net.inet.tcp.blackhole is set, an RST will not be emitted. If the concern is that you don't want sendmail to even try to do the auth, just insert define(`confTO_IDENT', `0s')dnl in the .mc file from which the .cf is generated, and it won't do that any more. [Sorry; had hoped to respond yesterday, and got involved with oyther things. And the mail backlog may be such that someone already pointed this out; my apologies if so. dhw] Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator Desk: 650/577-7158 TIE: 8/499-7158 Cell: 650/759-0823 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010041357.e94DvQc92408>