From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 16:32:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C980216A41F for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:32:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ritamari.vonostingroup.com [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C999943D7D for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:32:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from adsl-68-72-248-38.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.72.248.38] helo=[192.168.1.33]) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F1R5b-0004IC-Ej; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:32:15 -0500 Message-ID: <43D65689.8050207@vonostingroup.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:32:09 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <6E2E84047A522AA3CF4F3F8D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <6E2E84047A522AA3CF4F3F8D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 OpenPGP: url=http://www.franksworld.org/~laszlof/keys/0x0B3FCA4B.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vonostingroup.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something wrong with portlint? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:32:20 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I had all sorts of problems with portlint yesterday. I kept getting > errors that the COMMENT was missing even though it wasn't. I got > complaints about things being out of order when they weren't. (X is > in the MAINTAINER section - but it wasn't.) In the end, I had to > submit the ports even though they wouldn't pass portlint because *I* > knew they were done correctly (and they worked without errors), not > because portlint gave its stamp of approval. > > Has there been a recent code change that might have caused this? (I'm > running 5.4 SECURITY on an i386 processor.) > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > There has been some extensive port framework changes (see -ports archive) If you send the PR in question, I'd gladly take a look at it for you. Thanks __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584