From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 06:50:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B53116A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:50:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F5E43FE1 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9UEoGFY083489 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9UEoGbN083488; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:50:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200310301450.h9UEoGbN083488@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jason Slagle Subject: Re: misc/58529: Patch for RDWR bpf in pcap. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jason Slagle List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:50:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/58529; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Slagle To: Kris Kennaway Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/58529: Patch for RDWR bpf in pcap. Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:53:41 -0500 (EST) There are some machine simulators which rely on the fact they can write to the socket to send data. One of which is simh. NetBSD and Linux both have since made it writeable, so I'm not sure theres a downside to doing so. Jason On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 01:07:31PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote: > > > >Description: > > FreeBSD does not open BPF socket R/W > > Please explain why you think it should. > > Thanks, > Kris >