From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug 14 10:19:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA15264
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA15258;
          Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id KAA13898; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma013896; Wed Aug 14 10:19:13 1996
Message-ID: <32120A61.31DFF4F5@whistle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:18:25 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sos@freebsd.org
CC: "archie Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipfw vs ipfilter?
References: <199608141303.PAA13221@ra.dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

sos@freebsd.org wrote:
> 
> In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote:

> I'm all for it !!
> It leaves the question what to do with julian's redirect code ??
> It shares much of the same "features" that ipfw does, and for all I care
> it can go as well.. Most of the features with it is now in ipfilter...
> 
Actually it's archie's code, but we really need it..
and I think I can make  a good argument for giving the capacity to 
use user-land agents for complicated packet processing. 
Possibly we can add a "divert' to ipfilter and get darren to accept it 
back..

> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>                So much code to hack -- so little time.