From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 20:59:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB79D106564A; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1558FC17; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from delta.delphij.net (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BECC0631A; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:59:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1321649946; bh=xIyobHUAf9UD4dPDQ8/uGbQ+p5ZgP2Z+92viP1Gkitg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=L/DMbqdWOV8LJ9Ixiz5ZIP1eqMzsttRuNqIl8iJfiS+O6l9o03p5keHhlI+/SaF1P SYCXcGqW5FtvhDP+WHYoL0/F5q6zDgDgx98thQMd2T8nKmcDjnOgfSH0V74Hy1/2dF n/xiVE0rbbzrLkDlmkHytj6YMNxImC14GO3us0Qw= Message-ID: <4EC6C718.40607@delphij.net> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:59:04 -0800 From: Xin LI Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <4EB6693F.2020102@delphij.net> <4EB71580.20507@FreeBSD.org> <4EB72290.8030104@delphij.net> <4EC6C247.6040807@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Garrett Cooper , d@delphij.net, Doug Barton , freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Annoying ERROR: 'wlan0' is not a DHCP-enabled interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:59:06 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/18/11 12:50, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Garrett, good day. > > Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:42:27PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Xin LI >> wrote: >>> Is there any counter reasoning about "having an interface >>> marked as non-DHCP is not an error"? I'm still not convinced >>> with the benefit of having it show an error message. >> >> +1. I consider this to be debug noise. > > Well, what about the silent output from 'cc -o test test.c' when > you have no file test.c or the compiler is absent? It is the same > thing (as I see it) and in this case will you expect that the > binary 'test' will be compiled and ready for use or not? I will, > but this can be my personal delusion. I don't think this is a valid argument to my reasoning... In this specific case, having test.c absent is an error, while in the rc.d/dhclient case, having an interface without DHCP configuration is a perfectly fine one, and worked fine in the past... Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOxscYAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBxDUIAJrIMkkekSqOEoAyFT9u3FvC hi9D7Ivrr7lTDHs9E/pZUj/Bl2ftbGp6OjySUbK2HJdsvTr1CWjpbudcru5JfE73 A+2F5kMdVVCk65otqcryo5wLzwb82rDRFQzwyFZIYLHLNn7MYiZWkq//YfzKYqbk O3D+VGTIAM8wfIZsYuBuUaALGfyJkEMlCH1+QAdOiHL8zUPr4gZvZLTC1YuTU6ha r+HH6VnXT5gTk8Ll/vEfCrVkAZyss/MWJ/evh+96Z3wkkK8w00zJVfPwEfQMxISQ LlHF/BAxBIVhzLqesLiQ6AwSdg6pthJTAxhORPeH7JYdM6nC/VgnuUzS5gDA2dI= =l6xY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----