From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 11:41:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A20037B401; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C5843FE5; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5PIfWaQ001772; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5PIfVkJ001729; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:30 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Juli Mallett Message-ID: <20030625184130.GA45336@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200306251811.h5PIBWxs078351@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030625132653.A11826@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030625132653.A11826@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stdlib.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:41:33 -0000 On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:26:53PM -0500, Juli Mallett wrote: > Please make the lint case the default case. The error is silly. It is not silly. Alloca is *so* tied to how the compiler is generating code that it isn't funny. Note we have no alloca implementation in /usr/src -- the compiler *must* provide it. What is the use in compiling something you cannot link? I know some are working on TenDRA and I don't want to leave a hidden land mine for it to fall over. > And don't tell me to add definitions for those compilers along with > lint. I wouldn't have the lint case in there personally -- BDE has mentioned several times that lint should better follow what ever standard or compiler it is trying to lint for. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)