From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 1 13:14:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA08721 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jan 1998 13:14:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from base486.home.org (imdave@imdave.pr.mcs.net [205.164.3.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA08713 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 1998 13:14:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imdave@mcs.net) Received: (from imdave@localhost) by base486.home.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA29660; Thu, 1 Jan 1998 15:13:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 15:13:51 -0600 (CST) From: Dave Bodenstab Message-Id: <199801012113.PAA29660@base486.home.org> To: hoek@hwcn.org, imdave@mcs.net Subject: Re: ports/5393: DOOMSRC port : package Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Thanks for your comments. I got some feedback from someone who (I guess) grabbed it from the incoming directory, and he had a build problem with the X11 includes. I've forgotten, but I think that I automatically do a symlink of /usr/include/X11 --> /usr/X11R6/include on my machine, so I didn't catch this problem. I fixed this. Based on your comments, I also added a command line argument to ignore the version check, so it is no longer critical that the version number match the person's doom version. A few more questions please: I put the new port in ftp://pub/FreeBSD/incoming as: doomsrc.tgz.010197 doomsrc.readme.010198 (I know -- I forgot it's 1998) Do I use send-pr to mention this update? Do I email someone? Will I get some sort of feedback if the port is ``accepted''? If there is more feedback, and I need to update it in the future, how do I best do that? Id's version is 1.10, so my first take is that this should be the version number for the package -- is this reasonable even tho the port is updated over time? Thanks. Dave Bodenstab imdave@mcs.net