From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Oct  3 12: 3:44 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E78637B66D
	for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 12:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2])
	by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20750;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 13:01:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001003123112.04c6ee80@localhost>
X-Sender: brett@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:01:50 -0600
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: Re: politeness 
Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <49242.970591720@critter>
References: <Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:37:58 MDT." <4.3.2.7.2.20001003103503.04c68240@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Moved to -chat.

At 10:48 AM 10/3/2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>In your particular case:  If you want to avoid being banned and
>filtered: Yes, it means that.

To demand that someone with whom you do not agree be silenced is
a sign of poor leadership qualities and suggests that you should
not be in a leadership position. 

Furthermore, what you are suggesting would set a terrible precedent. 
I have never suggested that ANYONE be banned from a list such as the
FreeBSD -security or -chat lists, and never would.

>In all my time in core, nobody even closely rivals your uncontested
>number one ranking as the person most people want banned & filtered
>from our lists.

This seems to be your personal opinion, which you are attempting to
project onto others. Most of the other core team members with whom I
communicate are cordial.

--Brett Glass



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message