Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Apr 1996 07:10:56 -0500
From:      Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
To:        uriah.heep.sax.de!joerg_wunsch@dg-rtp.dg.com, freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 2.1-RELEASE vs. 2.1-STABLE.
Message-ID:  <199604031210.HAA13196@lakes>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> >  Since I'm a lonely, ol' UUCP site - is there a set of diff's
> >  between RELEASE and STABLE to bring a 2.1-RELEASE source tree
> 
> Hmm, -stable is rather a moving target, and despite of its name, said
> to be not that stable as all...
> 
> >  up to 2.1-STABLE.   Is there a CVS log somewhere that shows
> >  the difference between these two named versions?
> 
> CVS log: yes.  100-line summary: no.
> 
> I don't know if it would be a good idea to automagically generate CVS
> diffs between RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE and RELENG_2_1_0 (that are the tags
> by name), and drop this diff somewhere onto freefall...
> 

Okaley, Dokaley...  I'll just stick to 2.1-RELEASE.

	 - Thanks -
	- Dave Rivers -



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604031210.HAA13196>