From owner-freebsd-security Mon Aug 21 18:27:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF2837B43C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 18:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA56027; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:27:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id TAA42980; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:26:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008220126.TAA42980@harmony.village.org> To: Mipam Subject: Re: icmptypes Cc: Jaroshenko Serge , William Wong , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:17:59 +0200." References: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:26:13 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message Mipam writes: : Okay, however, why not block in all icmp and let yourself be able to ping : to the outside. With state keeping you'll recieve the reply's. : Unless of course you wish ppl to ping you initially? DO NOT BLOCK ALL ICMP PACKETS. There, I'm done shouting. Blocking all ICMP packets breaks path mtu discovery. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message