From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 7 11:46:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD7E558 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 11:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63BF1B1 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 11:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wggx12 with SMTP id x12so7489454wgg.10 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:46:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hGDyXGzs9heBSjM/iisPO2zqp1i4FAFYfr2uUzxbJfg=; b=PAsCcA7UjzB/oHY1Nrv5OQ8sqsQza9HH2EzitiwQA6rkeeoQpTKCHmW6fvNH98aAjW Tzdjd5fSZ6jCK+1srALAa3ZNUtQ+CkpLbdUa8lHcrjxtEC6zTE8bemCwCxUR6P1oeF4l P3pFWI5zlwzaYA6NXedHjkZw4zBf/hhNums+ZzArtz9lxjSch3v4LjFkYpKlR+wRwXe5 wo9rna5Bu7ihylpaQH323lvK3+KxcYkQ/PoFlLnd12UHZfk56BmnvNoRNlT1aZgSIMHA wit/4GRGXo2lFpH0WDLTN2GQk+5/Q2B/darJpP8SvF8ikQ5314JO1KhpXAZwHb5AFijU aDKw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlMvkpUVh4Yh5K/VogMgzw/sMz7zQYlbjbeV2U7mlmGpcOQI5iiPTKMW1NS+GdNGxQYRz3X X-Received: by 10.180.208.43 with SMTP id mb11mr27972492wic.52.1425728796736; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.68] (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.141.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jy7sm38237083wid.22.2015.03.07.03.46.35 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:46:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54FAE513.3030107@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:46:27 +0000 From: Steven Hartland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS Deadlock? References: <54FAD0B2.8060601@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAD47B.7090007@sorbs.net> <54FADEBF.2060905@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:46:45 -0000 On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: >> >> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>> Steven Hartland wrote: >>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated >>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there. >>>> >>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4? Will there be a 9.4? >>> >> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to >> 10 not 9 or 8. > I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more > releases just patches... but are we not getting a 9.4? Should not the > known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated? > I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I wouldn't expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm honest, the team only has so much time so prioritising the latest releases is just something that's going to have to happen. We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-)