From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 09:50:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5A51065678; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DC88FC17; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p879oJrm044016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:50:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E673E56.9000904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:50:14 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erwin Lansing References: <201109062309.p86N9A4E053967@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110907061625.GM71220@droso.net> <4E6725C5.2020703@FreeBSD.org> <01DF168C-CD09-482B-8185-834735F254D9@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <01DF168C-CD09-482B-8185-834735F254D9@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/accessibility/orca Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:50:23 -0000 On 2011/09/07 10:35, Erwin Lansing wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Yes. >> >> But if you kill -9 the dbus process, it completes successfully. >> gnome@ people were looking into it back when the issue was new, and figured out nothing. >> > Hmm, ok. > >> Can you check ~pav/bin/pointykill, you might want to deploy it on i386. >> It's a crude workaround but it works. > > That's…. crude. Could you take the version from ~ports-i386/pointykill instead so we can share the code between archs? Sure. Note you forgot to replace hardcoded amd64 in straslivy call :) Fixed that too. -- Pav Lucistnik