From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 10:23:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5B637B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.gnf.org (ns1.gnf.org [63.196.132.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16CD43FA3 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org (exch02.lj.gnf.org [172.25.10.20]) by ns1.gnf.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h48HNPZu099251 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from roark.gnf.org ([172.25.24.15]) by EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:26 -0700 Received: from roark.gnf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h48HNQSY098467; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: (from gtetlow@localhost) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h48HNQXW098466; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:23:26 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030508.093911.48456930.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zfao1/4IORAeFOVj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2003 17:23:26.0492 (UTC) FILETIME=[89020DC0:01C31586] cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:23:28 -0000 --Zfao1/4IORAeFOVj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> > Gordon Tetlow writes: > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : >=20 > : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers@. It looked like it was > : > further along than what's been posted here. > :=20 > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that. >=20 > NetBSD put them in /rescue. /stand has been phased out over the past > few years. There's precident many ways. Can we please not argue of > stupid shit like this? That's why we get into these damn bikesheds. Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference. -gordon --Zfao1/4IORAeFOVj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+upKORu2t9DV9ZfsRAm9XAJ9WMxpcTTlhMCy/xE/fxH55XnkWegCeKVKg xihCEMfj4UYSyCYl3Ie+Sqo= =zGiZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zfao1/4IORAeFOVj--