From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 25 16:33:33 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0416A537
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:33:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org)
Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB20213C43E
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org)
Received: from gotou-daichi-nokonpyuta.local (east61-p181.eaccess.hi-ho.ne.jp
	[219.105.23.182])
	by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BEB244C3A;
	Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:33:31 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <46F9384E.5010409@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:33:18 +0900
From: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
References: <46F905FD.9060208@freebsd.org> <fdb5a8$486$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <fdb5a8$486$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:33:33 -0000

Ivan Voras wrote:
> Daichi GOTO wrote:
>> Hi Guys again
>>
>> Today is not unionfs. 
> 
> How is the unionfs patch progressing through re ? :) I hope it gets 
> digested soon :)

I have sent a aprove request to re@ and been waiting for replay.
I have a hope to get aproval mail too :)  I beleive in that recent
unionfs patches bunch is well viewed and working very good.

>> We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests,
>> please try follow patch.
>>
>>   http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/
> 
> This looks useful, but shouldn't this feature be handled more globally, 
> with a MAC policy or something like that?

Yes, that is not depending to MAC or other comprehensive access
framework. At the beginning, what's important is that I have anyone
needs that feature or not ;-)  If someone needs that feature, I
will get the work of more comprehensive mechanism.