Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 08:01:28 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@knobel.gun.de> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.92.960329075940.206B-100000@knobel.gun.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960328003117.16907d-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu, 28 Mar 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > W/o any real hard numbers, I noticed that when running the perl 5.002 > testsuite that BSD/OS 2.0 on a P5-90 runs the tests more quickly than my > P5-120 running -stable. > > > BSD/OS 2.0.1 numbers for make test: > All tests successful. > u=0.65 s=1.03333 cu=11.8667 cs=12.6833 files=94 tests=2105 > > FreeBSD 2.1-stable numbers: > All tests successful. > u=1 s=1.8 cu=26.0667 cs=15.5 files=94 tests=2103 All tests successful. u=0.8 s=0.483333 cu=19.6667 cs=7.01667 files=94 tests=2103 FreeBSD-current, CFLAGS -> -pipe -m486 -O2 ASUS TP4XE, 100MHz Pentium, 256k burst cache... andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ $$ Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de $$ pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<< -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMVuKyfMLpmkD/U+FAQHwVAP+KuipddLFC+h45FmR0UdeVjcJ7uaQRFz9 RX9clqBo2/OC1WC89RJKuwIXDiPdUYRoaj9Pyl7Jx7/sT8vKWHXuNwrpDjXSSuKq K09leUyEVIDH4poDHKGbQbRAVYH82c6gHpUvSvfI0MfK098eYX+lxjYjJxYxmDLd yjJEu4oacmM= =apst -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.92.960329075940.206B-100000>