From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Sat Apr 11 20:42:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA4A27A5AE for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4906J26Rw7z45f0 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@cedro.info) Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id x11so5297172otp.6 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:42:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cedro.info; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LNHLTBzp3FIKOPdE/n6XyMyV4aIH6Bhs1iCfB/qe6kc=; b=LMGFTmhSpN6aTkChYwM442/uScSJzLfhVia1ktwC8GDAQ7JHVXJjwZYb/zYQMNOT+j ONS+RZgAIXORZI9z+5lwJFhUglsnFBGQ8RfljR24cdEOXbypyORz4i7exsZ8iklrZSfZ w77lM5xekKNrSyV2CPIZHRYXnWaFbLs4IafOUTMFs2f2UsJHH6Lw7aSbaFl1xcdmlphT uHu/hy3WuEp47Y2bXgBMJotjPtZlk9P59WSMLulmPBKoldfXMNoBJ06W2dIkAtS+Aut0 6gEUBVJeUWgNAkyHt76KpwHcU93JN79uuo7dQ7ucB9kZDYMPVUjeH/KkJFFoKnHT2nPI XtUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LNHLTBzp3FIKOPdE/n6XyMyV4aIH6Bhs1iCfB/qe6kc=; b=q4yRxHLRUHOKPHtO7M3ikEot/6CsvwhMTHZzG6Ms/BwhRJl5PnuxA47ePAOeJnbqJy 8LoG2e+fnc2yKrcIB3m2sEhG5GSIVAGDfqlpLhzqVUIYYvtLBi0B287TvYL7K81fQ8V/ 5tHegfMv/7L3SxAxMb+mgCI9wsQgXfR2O/C44lUPtdhl5Mj4/U5Lvn2wuJ3S+2vRMM2P 5A9q2/qfwKLHOX/r0mbrfux/d1wEeqE4abVjMTDVT7WRneabFjckXf0aoXBMt9bcQjwr PCveGigeqKp0tiUJMSP/I0OVFEd6maYR7pa2siPekAcmaeJXltWsQst5CSBDLDFCjQn5 4mqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ8AGlB+wZsUlhxtip/eFpt1ilkyoQiHEsGAa3UM3G2Upoy5RiJ DODx+n/ny+W/96uIijoRpYOIUA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLDAUjUAfkPvW9lSI5GG/8Z6S1ZUTWAA4HlPGjlhMT7T+VUxXfVAOKBn6ojj7NVaCuDQe+Bxw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:12a6:: with SMTP id g35mr8755131otg.333.1586637729554; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi1-f172.google.com (mail-oi1-f172.google.com. [209.85.167.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l188sm3449881oib.44.2020.04.11.13.42.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f172.google.com with SMTP id e4so4315986oig.9; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:485:: with SMTP id z5mr7242943oid.78.1586637727970; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:42:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6094091586626901@vla1-a1bfe7298e26.qloud-c.yandex.net> In-Reply-To: <6094091586626901@vla1-a1bfe7298e26.qloud-c.yandex.net> From: Tomasz CEDRO Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 22:41:44 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg mirrors extremely slow, why not use the ftp mirrors? To: Martin Hanson Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4906J26Rw7z45f0 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cedro.info header.s=google header.b=LMGFTmhS; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tomek@cedro.info has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c) smtp.mailfrom=tomek@cedro.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cedro.info:s=google]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cedro.info]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cedro.info:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yandex.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.74)[ip: (-7.88), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-0.33), asn: 15169(-0.43), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:42:11 -0000 On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 7:42 PM Martin Hanson wrote: > I'm on a gigabit connection in EU, using the "pkg0.bme.freebsd.org" is horrible: +1 on this one :-( Compared to Linux repos where you can fetch really large amount of packages in a seconds we are really behind :-( I can see some improvement in speed recently but its still too slow.. I love PKG system, it saves so much time on compiling, setting up, and maintenance. I know that PKG is using geolocation for better access and that packages need to be signed for security so these repositories are in control of the FreeBSD project.. Maybe creating more smaller mirrors could be helpful? Maybe allowing people to share their broadbands could be helpful? How about creating a dedicated low-power distributed ARM based PKG delivery system that could be burned to a SD card then run from some sort of *Pi device connected to a broadband? This way we could have lots of low power local delivery locations that could act as PKG mirrors :-) I will provide a dedicated thread for that idea to discuss :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info