From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  9 07:59:28 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9773E106566C;
	Mon,  9 Jan 2012 07:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1ea])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9768FC08;
	Mon,  9 Jan 2012 07:59:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 28C8811A8DD;
	Mon,  9 Jan 2012 07:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmom08uFV+NMryjZon_xnqo95MAK8r2=0s_JqRet7EMdn4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:59:26 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <09C21BD6-46E1-4593-9E3C-183CF229A613@lassitu.de>
References: <CAJ-Vmom08uFV+NMryjZon_xnqo95MAK8r2=0s_JqRet7EMdn4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Where should I put ar71xx_* modules?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:59:28 -0000

Am 09.01.2012 um 00:42 schrieb Adrian Chadd:

> Hi,
>=20
> In order to fit an lzma'd kernel in 892 kilobytes of flash (that's 892
> * 1024 bytes), I've needed to break out a few things into modules.
>=20
> I'd like to commit a couple of modules - for example,
> ar71xx_ehci/ar71xx_ohci for USB stuff - but I don't want them built
> for anything other than ar71xx builds. Thus I don't see the reason for
> putting them in sys/modules/Makefile.
>=20
> They build fine if they're included in MODULES_OVERRIDE in the
> relevant kernel config file.
>=20
> So is it ok to just commit some modules in sys/modules/ which aren't
> in the Makefile, and instead include them in the relevant SoC kernel
> configs so they're built? Or is there some other tradition for doing
> this?

Why would it hurt to have them connected to the standard build?  Doe the =
tinderboxes build modules?


Stefan

--=20
Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 151 14070811