Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:41:41 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports CHANGES UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.port.mk ports/accessibility/linux-atk Makefile pkg-plist ports/archivers/stuffit Makefile ports/astro/linux-setiathome Makefile ports/audio/baudline Makefile ports/audio/linux-arts ... Message-ID: <42BEBEA5.10509@magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20050626035619.5dc6de8c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200506172259.j5HMxTad068378@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506251924.24269.lofi@freebsd.org> <42BDF3D9.6000803@magnesium.net> <20050626035619.5dc6de8c@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:16:25 -0700 > Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> wrote: > > >>lofi - >> >>You're kindof beating a dead horse here. Many, many people agree with >>you here, and the topic received widespread support when I brought it up >>at the BSCan ports BoF. The issue isn't whether stuff should go into >>LOCALBASE instead of X11BASE, it's how to deploy a mass migration. >> >>For the meantime, stuff should go into X11BASE, where everything X-based >>except for KDE and OOo is, and should become part of the list of stuff >>to be moved to LOCALBASE. > > > That's not enough. The new policy needs to be documented, so that > people which didn't attended the ports Bof (because they didn't visited > BSDCan) know about it. > > Bye, > Alexander. Policy? There's no policy here. My recommendation was simply "keep doing what we've been doing, and let's draw up a plan." # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42BEBEA5.10509>