From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 13:29:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782B910656A8; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307358FC2C; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.21.141] (helo=devil.micom.mng.net) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KnCdM-0006EK-Q6; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:29:52 +0800 Message-ID: <48EB6450.9050004@micom.mng.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:29:52 +0800 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080901) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org References: <48DA1B65.8030106@micom.mng.net> In-Reply-To: <48DA1B65.8030106@micom.mng.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=78F6425E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw port lookup table patch for review X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:29:55 -0000 Hi, I have just made the patches that use arrays for port entries. It is under the same directory: http://people.freebsd.org/~ganbold/ipfw_port_table/ Array version (each array can have IPFW_TABLES_MAX entries): http://people.freebsd.org/~ganbold/ipfw_port_table/ipfw_port_table_array_unsorted/ List version is still at: http://people.freebsd.org/~ganbold/ipfw_port_table/ipfw_port_table_list_unsorted/ thanks, Ganbold Ganbold wrote: > Hi, > > I thought it might be useful to have port lookup table similar to > existing IP lookup table > in ipfw and I have made patch for that. > > The downside of the patch so far I'm seeing is the port entries are in > linked list > (no limitation yet, memory overhead), not sorted and it uses linear > search > to match (could be slow when lot of entries). > > Just after I've made the patch I saw > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121807&cat= . :( > > I agree with PR's reply however for small number of port entries I > thought > this functionality is quite useful. It gives benefit like no need to > modify existing rule, > adding/deleting port entries is easy. > > I did some small tests and it seems like working. > > Patches are at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~ganbold/ipfw_port_table/ > > The output of some usage samples is at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~ganbold/ipfw_port_table/ipfw_port_table_usage_sample.txt > > > Patches can be successfully applied to CURRENT. Didn't test RELENG_7 > due to > no RELENG_7 PC :) > Please let me know your thoughts. I'm happy to discuss to improve the > patch. > Correct me if I'm doing something wrong here. > > thanks, > > Ganbold > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >