From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 14 17:55:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EE01065679;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net)
Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CA08FC17;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
	s=fsm; 
	h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
	bh=H5HuC6f1zLZn/iZE9rSzVBa6GimuIdr5WV8rZoyf9bw=; 
	b=P0a5+C+QspdhOkFWZHN5MJx+rooqxJQlNCwltxzVAO88ay7bFsjjzeY2MqGt/+9YIJ/mC0vkLkMoFTbNcYNuJ3bKdvQo7vwgj/Xbngp+M2usczXPalskGQ2vzlbYNGVUVyptOud0DluvzMXe3sV+ttAaRd1sR8dQCWPYAdOAQCA=;
Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost.)
	by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1Rat3X-000O37-NU
	; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:55:51 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:55:49 +0200
From: Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20111214195549.415196f0@nonamehost.>
In-Reply-To: <20111214173435.GA41893@vniz.net>
References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com>
	<4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<4EE69C5A.3090005@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111213104048.40f3e3de@nonamehost.>
	<20111213090051.GA3339@vniz.net>
	<CAJ-Vmo=y44c2Lek058Rc=thVb+gzu2fm7i0vMHipiGGHC086Yw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111214173435.GA41893@vniz.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:55:53 -0000

=D0=92 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400
Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:

> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the
> > >> problem has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE
> > >> scheduler.
> > >
> > > I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine
> > > (Pentium 4) in very visible places, like 'ps ax' output stucks in
> > > the middle by ~1 second. When I switch back to SHED_4BSD, all
> > > slowness is gone.
> >=20
> > Are you able to provide KTR traces of the scheduler results?
> > Something that can be fed to schedgraph?
>=20
> Sorry, this machine is not mine anymore. I try SCHED_ULE on Core 2
> Duo instead and don't notice this effect, but it is overall pretty
> fast comparing to that Pentium 4.
>=20

Give me, please, detailed instructions on how to do it - I'll do it ...
Be a shame if this the theme is will end again just only the
discussions ...  :(