From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 07:54:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAC116A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:54:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DB343D55 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:54:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j3L7snS6014844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:54:50 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j3L7sn7l015733; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:54:49 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)j3L7snun015732; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:54:49 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:54:49 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: dragonfly dragonfly Message-ID: <20050421075449.GE12673@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050419200039.GA12673@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about porting LVS to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:54:53 -0000 On Wed, 2005-Apr-20 08:55:17 +0800, dragonfly dragonfly wrote: >My meaning is to see whether it is useful. I think it is. I work with applications at work that run on HP TruCluster and I can see the advantages of using clustering to building HA servers. I may even have an application for it (though I'll need to study it in more details to confirm that). >So I only construct a framework to make it run first. It would be preferable if the kernel changes were distributed as diffs rather than replacement files - that would make it much easier to identify the changes. >My goal is to make it totally independent >to the Linux Compability codes.make it a absolute kernel modules,no need >kernel patches. Good. If we can resolve the licensing issues, this looks good. -- Peter Jeremy