From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 20 07:09:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A69E16A417 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristi@net.utcluj.ro) Received: from bavaria.utcluj.ro (unknown [IPv6:2001:b30:5000:2:20e:cff:fe4b:ca01]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09B313C442 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristi@net.utcluj.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bavaria.utcluj.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C39C50871; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:09:51 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by the daemon playing with your mail on local.mail.utcluj.ro Received: from bavaria.utcluj.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bavaria.utcluj.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3Ly0E18D3ic; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:09:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [172.27.2.200] (c7.campus.utcluj.ro [193.226.6.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bavaria.utcluj.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C11250884; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:09:48 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <46F21CBC.2060506@net.utcluj.ro> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:09:48 +0300 From: Cristian KLEIN User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <46F1AC0B.9040109@ibctech.ca> <46F1BDE1.8090102@gmail.com> <46F1F136.3010203@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <46F1F136.3010203@ibctech.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mattr@eagle.ca, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Sten Daniel Soersdal Subject: Re: Quagga as border router X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:09:53 -0000 Steve Bertrand wrote: >> But OpenBGPD doesn't look like an alternative for you, if you are using >> ipv6 as it only supports ipv4 route distribution (according to man pages) > > IPv6 is an absolute MANDATORY requirement. If a recommendation does not > support IPv6, than it will NOT fit into my environment. I'm curious. Has anybody tried xorp? Is it competitive when used in environments with many routes? It does support both IPv4 and IPv6.