Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:45:23 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 Message-ID: <20120710134523.GA84396@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4FFBF16D.2030007@gwdg.de> References: <4FC40449.3040602@missouri.edu> <20120528233035.GA77157@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FC40DEA.8030703@missouri.edu> <20120529000756.GA77386@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FC43C8F.5090509@missouri.edu> <20120529045612.GB4445@server.rulingia.com> <20120708124047.GA44061@zim.MIT.EDU> <210816F0-7ED7-4481-ABFF-C94A700A3EA0@bsdimp.com> <20120708233624.GA53462@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FFBF16D.2030007@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:10:05AM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: > > Do you think your version from > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152415 for expl() ld80 > version could be the one getting into head? Would you be willing to > commit it? That's a fairly early version of the ld80 expl(). bde and das reviewed the code and made several suggested changes. > As far as I understand from discussions on R mailing list > (r-devel@r-project.org), they plan to reduce the emulation and/or > workaround of long and complex math functions for FreeBSD and other > systems with their next releases of R devel. So we could really need > some progress with our C99 conform math functions ;-) I don't know R, and I don't understand what is meant by 'they plan to reduce the emulation and/or workaround of ... funtions'. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120710134523.GA84396>