From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct 17 01:21:07 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA14032
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 01:21:07 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA14022
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 01:20:56 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA01355; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 01:19:38 -0700
Message-Id: <199510170819.BAA01355@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: From BSDi mailing list on gcc-2.6.3 bugs: (fwd) A brief note 
 about cc and gcc 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Oct 1995 16:29:01 +0200."
             <199510161429.QAA26398@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 01:19:37 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 > In 2.0, `cc' gets you gcc 1.42 and `gcc' or `gcc2' gets you 2.6.3.
 > Neither one of them is quite the same as the distribution version;
 > in particular, I have installed at least a half dozen bug fixes in
 > the 2.6.3 that we ship (including one that threw in a new bug, so

Has anyone managed to get gcc 1.42 to work with FreeBSD 2.x?

I can really use some fast compilation for development/testing.

Tnks,
	Amancio