From owner-freebsd-emulation  Tue Jun 18 21:08:52 1996
Return-Path: owner-emulation
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA05227
          for emulation-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA05206
          for <FreeBSD-Emulation@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA07079; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:08:48 -0700
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:08:48 -0700
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
Message-Id: <199606190408.VAA07079@kithrup.com>
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, sam@wa4phy.async.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Cc: FreeBSD-Emulation@freebsd.org,
        galois!worldnet.att.net!pkersey@freefall.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> the time/inclination to bother with mess-dos emulation.  I apologize for
>> sounding negative, since I just volunteered to do docs, but maybe another
>> soul can shed some light on what has been accomplished as far as the 
>> ms-dos emulation port.
>Every time this is asked, I explain that I HAVE NO TIME TO WORK ON THIS
>JUST NOW, and point to the repeated postings I've made pointing to where
>the current state of play is, and what to do.

And I, who have the time (sorta), don't really have the resources (although
that is changing, and when I get my new machine up and running, working on
DOS support is THE FIRST THING I WILL WORK ON).

Sean.