Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 07:25:42 -0500 From: "Edwin L. Culp" <eculp@encontacto.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: courier Message-ID: <20050528072542.oybo3q7dz4swog4w@mail.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <200505250838.29311.ports@dino.sk> References: <20050524204635.5fbdf4b3.dick@nagual.st> <200505250604.59120.milan.obuch@netlabplus.sk> <200505250838.29311.ports@dino.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Milan Obuch <ports@dino.sk>: > On Wednesday 25 May 2005 06:04, Milan Obuch wrote: >> On Tuesday 24 May 2005 20:46, dick hoogendijk wrote: >> > Any ideas how long it'll take until a new courier package will come out? >> > I'm running courier mailer on 4.11-stable, but cannot install it on my >> > 5.4-release because it's broken. That's not nice. I don't want to learn >> > another mailer. So, will it be much longer? any info on this? >> >> Try attached unofficial 0.50.0 port. It compiles for me :) I did not >> evaluate functionality however. I am using in production 0.49.0 version >> without issue (attached too). I would like to see courier port updated too >> - please test them and share your experiences. >> Milan Milan and Yarema, I still had two machines that needed upgrading to 50.0 from the old FreeBSD courier-ldap-0.45.4 port and decided to try it even though I've grown acustomed to having to complile my own. I decided to try it on one of them. It is up and running perfectly, only about 1/2 hour, but seems solid and stable. BTW the really AWESOME part is I didn't have to make any configuration changes, except to authldaprc and authdaemonrc and the respective changes in rc.conf for courier_authdaemond_enable that are now seperate and in /usr/local/etc/authlib and /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh but that is a no-brainer. Gonna do the other one tomorrow, if I find time. As you may remember, I have fam running on all my manually compiled courier .49 and .50 installations. Is it going to be used on FreeBSD? Is it beneficial? As a courier user, I can no see no reason to not commit the port as is. Thanks for all the work you guys have put into this. I think I like the seperate ports approach that you are taking rather than the megaport. Easier to upgrade the pieces. Have a great weekend, ed > > Argh, no attachments here :( > Download them from http://ports.dino.sk > Milan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050528072542.oybo3q7dz4swog4w>