From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 15:11:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C2A889 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA3EBA6 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A6F435C7; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:11:30 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53398590.1060500@marino.st> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:11:12 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" , FreeBSD ports mailing list Subject: Re: [mail/xmailbopx] Exactly what does "unmaintained" mean? References: <20140331145755.GA92814@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> In-Reply-To: <20140331145755.GA92814@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:11:50 -0000 On 3/31/2014 16:57, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: > Hi all, > > The port mail/xmailbox is set to be removed soon because it has been > unmaintained since 2000. In this case, does "unmaintained" refer to just > the FreeBSD port, or to the software itself? And in either case, is there > anything that can be done to prevent removal? I think in this context "unmaintained" means the MAINTAINER has been set to ports@freebsd.org continuously for years. I don't think you can infer upstream hasn't been updated in that time. To prevent removal, I'd recommend somebody audit the port makefiles, update to the latest upstream version available, and set the MAINTAINER value to themselves. I think it would defeat the intent to simply change MAINTAINER value but not do anything (and later throw it back on heap untouched). So personally I'd like to an effort at renewing a port that hasn't had a maintainer in over a decade before pulling if off death row.... Just speaking for myself of course. John