Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:22:22 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Mike Hunter <mhunter@ack.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: Donatas <donatas@lrtc.net> Subject: Re: vlan double tagging Message-ID: <20041217232222.GB32399@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20041217230349.GA15905@ack.Berkeley.EDU> References: <005801c4e42a$a1825890$9f90a8c0@donatas> <20041217223519.GB27607@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20041217230349.GA15905@ack.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:03:49PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote: > On Dec 17, "Brooks Davis" wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote: > > > hello, > > > i'd like to ask if there's any possibility to pass double tagged vlan= packets through freebsd 5.x routers? > > > and....how many level1 vlans are supported on one parent device? > >=20 > > I don't know what happens with double tagged vlan packets. >=20 > I think what he's asking about is whether FreeBSD prevents any of the > nasty hacks that can be accomplished by double-tagging frames, or if there > is something he can do with netgraph to prevent such badness. My suspicion is that FreeBSD will drop the packets unless you configure a vlan interface on the vlan interface. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBw2otXY6L6fI4GtQRAl00AKC2s5C5KVEOsoFebOxNeAU2Q7d3dACfcHIy PGI85cX5Eh0fsoMwnSJ0llY= =x6Tp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041217232222.GB32399>