From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar 20 11: 4:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A9C4437B71C; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:04:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2KJ4Wf96532;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:04:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:04:32 -0800 (PST)
From: <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200103201904.f2KJ4Wf96532@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: roman@xpert.com, obrien@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/25315: [NEW PORT] security/nmap-devel
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: [NEW PORT] security/nmap-devel

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: obrien
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 11:03:58 PST 2001
State-Changed-Why: 
I just do not see the need in such a port.  Why does security/nmap not
suit the need?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25315

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message