From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Aug 29 06:08:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE733B77784 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A5FCE2 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+SvSvOdCqpVL7LMC0FZb/8lO8VJfKtqxvi1GoSJRbEE=; b=X9cTrg6irik8aUcQYtvVla1zrJ OnacUSvORjQrNJ45ITKOjTLQ7SVHzCzGShWos8W1sM+tk5pAcpQNYEqmPYHCXi7RP+HgC1Dhm2c1O DMOyHL1HhsthcLW/yvFqAV0WT7J5B7qRfhCWPPJh1zbUm0sOmEqpmqxHU9bxVAR7FTos=; Received: from [114.121.233.180] (port=40981 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1beFk5-0033rh-7R; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:08:21 -0600 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:08:16 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Fernando Herrero =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Carr=F3n?= Cc: Andrea Brancatelli , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <20160829140816.2e9479f4@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20160819073422.4292997b@X220.alogt.com> <20160821144505.27c0f55d@X220.alogt.com> <827183a944ee4052649c152d65204444@schema31.it> <20160822101423.GF18643@e-new.0x20.net> <20160822120215.GV22212@zxy.spb.ru> <20160823110159.GU18643@e-new.0x20.net> <20160824045558.18c86764@X220.alogt.com> <3234db29c228879cc473deec0b09568c@schema31.it> <20160826132059.63c23ee5@X220.alogt.com> <20160828060601.08ea91a8@X220.alogt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Authenticated-Sender: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:08:28 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:41:42 +0200 Fernando Herrero Carr=C3=B3n wrote: > El 28/8/2016 0:06, "Erich Dollansky" > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > Hi, > > > > Micheal did a plain compiler benchmark on FreeBSD 11: > > > > =20 > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dfreebsd11-clang-gc= c&num=3D1 > > > > It shows clearly how slow CLang is compared to GCC. > > > > This is the price FreeBSD has to pay to be free of GPL in the base > > system. > > > > Erich =20 >=20 > Very cool comparison, thanks a lot! >=20 > I think gcc has a lot of knowledge and experience under its belt, a > larger user base so no wonder it performs [slightly] worse. What has > really surprised me has been ImageMagick, apparently because of > openmp. The OpenMP stack has been contributed by intel, clang 3.4 if > I recall it right. Surprising. >=20 this time, Micheal did a good job. GCC is just too old to be bad. The situation was the same for GCC when it was compared to commercial compilers those days. GCC was a lot slower. Erich