Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:38:28 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> Cc: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update ) Message-ID: <4C95AFE4.30608@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20100918141727.22a81b66@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <4C91446F.3090202@bsdforen.de> <20100916171744.GA48415@hades.panopticon> <4C927ED0.5050307@bsdforen.de> <86zkvhfhaa.fsf@gmail.com> <4C92C14D.3010005@FreeBSD.org> <4C92F195.5000605@FreeBSD.org> <4C93A107.4070809@DataIX.net> <4c93f602.pzTXVEQ%2B3q2cRA23%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4C94617B.3080702@bsdforen.de> <20100918141727.22a81b66@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/18/2010 07:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > I'm still to see a concise, clear, precise, listing of advantages that > switching from CVS would bring us, that would overcome the effort > needed to do it (committers, users, infrastructure, tools). > 1). http://bit.ly/d5UrtN 2). http://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf 3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi 4). Because CVS just does not do any of this. Make your final comparison here: http://bit.ly/cyQBn8 For the sake of argument can you think of any reason to not switch ? lets hear those, I'm interested. -- jhell,v
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C95AFE4.30608>