From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jul 12 10:48:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA12751
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA12746;
          Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA12133;
	Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199707121748.KAA12133@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: sane-0.61, gimp 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Jul 1997 23:32:58 EDT."
             <19970711233258.19580@tarsier.colo.erols.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:48:13 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Shouldn't the default for unknown devices be "SC_UNE_LU" and what happens
if I have two unknown devices?
Now that we have scsi scanner software perhaps whomever is mantaining
scsiconf.c should start thinking about adding entries to scsiconf for
the most popular scanners : umax, hp, etc...
sane,  scsi scanner,  home web page is 
http://www.azstarnet.com/%7eaxplinux/sane/

Any clues as to why Eric's system can't seem to find his UMAX?

	Tnks,
	Amancio

>From The Desk Of eric :
> On Fri, Jul 11, 1997 at 07:29:02PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Sorry I forgot to post this :
> > 
> > In scsiconf.c ,
> >  #define SC_SHOWME	0x01
> >  #define	SC_ONE_LU	0x00
> >  #define	SC_MORE_LUS	0x02
> > 
> > static struct scsidevs unknowndev =
> > 	{
> > 		T_UNKNOWN, T_UNKNOWN, 0, "*", "*", "*",
> > 		"uk", SC_ONE_LU
> > 		/*		"uk", SC_MORE_LUS*/
> > 	};
> > Make sure that you define uk to have only one "LU" 
> 
> 
> Hi-- thanks for responding so soon! 
> I changed scsiconf.c as you said, but now it returns "(aic0:5:0): error 
> code 96 " when trying to probe it, where before it seemed to successfully
> probe it, but "found" eight copies of it, one for each LUN.  Does this make
> any sense? :) 
> 
> 				eric
> 
> > 
> > If you like to get the graphical interface feel free to download 
> > ftp://rah.star-gate.com/pub/gimp-0.99.10.tar.gz
> > 
> > 	Have fun,
> > 	Amancio
> > 
> > 
> > >From The Desk Of eric :
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi... I saw a post in comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc where you said you are u
sing
> >  
> > > sane-0.61 and gimp with a UMAX scanner.. I'm trying to do the same thing 
but
> > > am not having much luck, as the sane sources don't seem to know anything 
abou
> > t
> > > freebsd. Do you have any idea which SCSI device driver it's meant to be
> > > using? Right now it's probing the scanner as "uk0" but I don't know if th
at's
> > > right. I've gotten "scanimage" (the non-graphical version) to compile but
 it
> > > doesn't succeed in finding the scanner on /dev/uk0 or anything else for t
hat
> > > matter. Did you have to do anything special to get it to work? 
> > > 
> > > 					Eric Volpe
> > > 		
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> e|a|e|d|c|                                                     Eric Volpe
> p|t|r|o|o|                                                     Erols Internet
> v| |o|t|m|                                                     Springfield VA
>  | |l| | |                                                     USA
>  | |s| | |  http://tarsier.colo.erols.net/Images/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-